EssayBang

為您留學生活排憂解難

代寫essay-assignment-留學生論文網課代上代修-HPessay

Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

V:essayok
EssayHP
留學生代寫為你提供最好的essay代寫服務。
Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

本報告的目的是探討推動恒天然成為媒體焦點的各種問題。本文對三個案例進行了識別、討論和深入分析,旨在突出企業面臨的挑戰。分析三例包括包括恒天然在中國的840萬美元提供護理,恒天然的24000美元罰款的酸在航道的釋放,和恒天然的新西蘭奶制品的老板,辭職后的新聞,38噸濃縮乳清蛋白生產顯示肉毒桿菌肉毒桿菌可能造成污染。
介紹
本報告的目的是討論恒天然在媒體中所表現出來的各種事件。公司不可能一次或一次地觸及媒體。這可能是由于錯誤或正確的原因而發生的,但最終,無論是對公司本身,還是對一般公眾和其他公司,都提供了重要的教訓。同樣對恒天然也是如此,它在許多情況下沖擊了媒體。然而,這篇文章局限于它認為重要的三個事件。這包括恒天然在中國提供護理,840萬美元(企業社會責任),恒天然的24000美元罰款的酸在航道釋放(環境問題),和恒天然的新西蘭奶制品的老板,辭職后的新聞,38噸濃縮乳清蛋白生產顯示肉毒桿菌肉毒桿菌可能造成污染。
提供醫療保健
2008年10月11日,新西蘭先驅報報道,新西蘭恒天然公司提供在中國有840萬美元提供保健(歐文,no date未注明出版日期)。片中,歐文(no date未注明出版日期)報道稱,恒天然已經建立了幫助婦女和母親中國慈善項目。這一舉動是對有毒牛奶的反應,導致數千名嬰兒患病,大約四人死亡。參與毒奶粉丑聞的公司是恒天然擁有的43%的San Lu。這一舉動是為了表示關心和提供長期援助嬰兒養育和產婦保健的一種方式。立即反應提供欣賞各種主流媒體透露在中國報告贊揚的舉動。新西蘭貿易協會主席指出,捐贈是巨大的,將在很大程度上幫助。然而,一些媒體報道稱,此舉是憤世嫉俗的公關企圖蒙蔽脆弱的中國家庭都遭到公司的不負責任的行為。然而,大多數媒體報道這是一個積極的姿態。例如,《新西蘭先驅報》提到,大規模的慈善捐贈應該獨立于其本身,而不是與牛奶污染悲劇密切相關。在一般情況下,當移動到捐贈給慈善機構已經在很大程度上與牛奶相關的悲劇,這是企業社會責任與糾正措施的行為遵循市場錯位。從本質上講,企業社會責任是當今世界的一個情感問題,越來越多的組織被鼓勵參與其中。它是企業在向社會提供社會利益的同時又增加其競爭優勢的一種途徑。然而,這正是恒天然在最近幾次登上頭版頭條的原因之一。

Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

The purpose of this report is to look into various issues which have propelled Fonterra into media limelight. In this article, three cases are identified, discussed and deeply analyzed with the aim of highlighting challenges face by corporations. The three cases analyzed include This include Fonterra’s $8.4m to offer care in China, Fonterra’s $24,000 fine for release of acid in waterway, and Fonterra NZ Milk Products bosses, resignation following news that 38 tonnes of whey protein concentrate the company produce showed possible contamination with botulism-causing Clostridium botulinum.
Introduction
The aim of this report is to discuss various incidences where Fonterra has featured in the media. It is not unlikely for companies to hit the media at one time or another. Such can happen due to either wrong or right reasons but ultimately, either offers important lessons not just to the company itself, but also to the general public and other corporations. The same is true for Fonterra which has hit the media but by storm in a number of instances. This piece however limits itself to three incidences it considers important to delve into. This include Fonterra’s $8.4m to offer care in China (Corporate Social Responsibility), Fonterra’s $24,000 fine for release of acid in waterway (environmental issue), and Fonterra NZ Milk Products bosses, resignation following news that 38 tonnes of whey protein concentrate the company produce showed possible contamination with botulism-causing Clostridium botulinum.
Offer for healthcare
On Oct 11, 2008 the New Zealand Herald reported that Fonterra had offered $8.4m to offer care in China (Owen,n.d). In the piece, Owen (n.d) reported that Fonterra had set up a charitable project to assist women in China and mothers. This move was a response to cases of poisonous milk that made thousands of infants sick and around four dead. Amongst the companies involved in the poisonous milk scandal was San Lu, 43% owned by Fonterra. This move was made as a gesture to show concern and a way of offering long-term assistance to infant upbringing and maternal healthcare. Immediately responses to the offered revealed appreciation with various leading Medias in china reporting praises to the move. New Zealand’s chairman of Chinese trade associations noted that the donation was substantial and would go a long way in helping. However, some media reported the move as a cynical public relations attempt to hoodwink the vulnerable Chinese families who had fallen victim to the company’s irresponsible act. However, most media outlets reported this as a positive gesture. For instance, New Zealand Herald mentioned that the massive charity donation should stand on its own as rather than being consistently linked to the milk contamination tragedy. In general, while the move to donate to charity has been largely associated with the milk tragedy, this is an act of corporate social responsibility which borders on a corrective action following a market misdoing. In essence, corporate social responsibility is an emotive issue in the modern world and more and more organizations are being encouraged to engage in the same. It is a way through which corporations give to the communities socially and at the same time increase their competitive advantage. This is however just one of the reasons Fonterra has hit the headlines in the recent past.


編輯團隊由海歸留學生,英語專八畢業生及相關專業寫手組成,旨在為您提供高品質的代寫服務。

EssayBang

代寫essay-assignment-留學生論文網課代上代修-HPessay

Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

V:essayok
EssayHP
EssayHP為你提供最好的essay代寫服務。
Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

本報告的目的是探討推動恒天然成為媒體焦點的各種問題。本文對三個案例進行了識別、討論和深入分析,旨在突出企業面臨的挑戰。分析三例包括包括恒天然在中國的840萬美元提供護理,恒天然的24000美元罰款的酸在航道的釋放,和恒天然的新西蘭奶制品的老板,辭職后的新聞,38噸濃縮乳清蛋白生產顯示肉毒桿菌肉毒桿菌可能造成污染。
介紹
本報告的目的是討論恒天然在媒體中所表現出來的各種事件。公司不可能一次或一次地觸及媒體。這可能是由于錯誤或正確的原因而發生的,但最終,無論是對公司本身,還是對一般公眾和其他公司,都提供了重要的教訓。同樣對恒天然也是如此,它在許多情況下沖擊了媒體。然而,這篇文章局限于它認為重要的三個事件。這包括恒天然在中國提供護理,840萬美元(企業社會責任),恒天然的24000美元罰款的酸在航道釋放(環境問題),和恒天然的新西蘭奶制品的老板,辭職后的新聞,38噸濃縮乳清蛋白生產顯示肉毒桿菌肉毒桿菌可能造成污染。
提供醫療保健
2008年10月11日,新西蘭先驅報報道,新西蘭恒天然公司提供在中國有840萬美元提供保健(歐文,no date未注明出版日期)。片中,歐文(no date未注明出版日期)報道稱,恒天然已經建立了幫助婦女和母親中國慈善項目。這一舉動是對有毒牛奶的反應,導致數千名嬰兒患病,大約四人死亡。參與毒奶粉丑聞的公司是恒天然擁有的43%的San Lu。這一舉動是為了表示關心和提供長期援助嬰兒養育和產婦保健的一種方式。立即反應提供欣賞各種主流媒體透露在中國報告贊揚的舉動。新西蘭貿易協會主席指出,捐贈是巨大的,將在很大程度上幫助。然而,一些媒體報道稱,此舉是憤世嫉俗的公關企圖蒙蔽脆弱的中國家庭都遭到公司的不負責任的行為。然而,大多數媒體報道這是一個積極的姿態。例如,《新西蘭先驅報》提到,大規模的慈善捐贈應該獨立于其本身,而不是與牛奶污染悲劇密切相關。在一般情況下,當移動到捐贈給慈善機構已經在很大程度上與牛奶相關的悲劇,這是企業社會責任與糾正措施的行為遵循市場錯位。從本質上講,企業社會責任是當今世界的一個情感問題,越來越多的組織被鼓勵參與其中。它是企業在向社會提供社會利益的同時又增加其競爭優勢的一種途徑。然而,這正是恒天然在最近幾次登上頭版頭條的原因之一。

Report 代寫:CSR報告怎么寫

The purpose of this report is to look into various issues which have propelled Fonterra into media limelight. In this article, three cases are identified, discussed and deeply analyzed with the aim of highlighting challenges face by corporations. The three cases analyzed include This include Fonterra’s $8.4m to offer care in China, Fonterra’s $24,000 fine for release of acid in waterway, and Fonterra NZ Milk Products bosses, resignation following news that 38 tonnes of whey protein concentrate the company produce showed possible contamination with botulism-causing Clostridium botulinum.
Introduction
The aim of this report is to discuss various incidences where Fonterra has featured in the media. It is not unlikely for companies to hit the media at one time or another. Such can happen due to either wrong or right reasons but ultimately, either offers important lessons not just to the company itself, but also to the general public and other corporations. The same is true for Fonterra which has hit the media but by storm in a number of instances. This piece however limits itself to three incidences it considers important to delve into. This include Fonterra’s $8.4m to offer care in China (Corporate Social Responsibility), Fonterra’s $24,000 fine for release of acid in waterway (environmental issue), and Fonterra NZ Milk Products bosses, resignation following news that 38 tonnes of whey protein concentrate the company produce showed possible contamination with botulism-causing Clostridium botulinum.
Offer for healthcare
On Oct 11, 2008 the New Zealand Herald reported that Fonterra had offered $8.4m to offer care in China (Owen,n.d). In the piece, Owen (n.d) reported that Fonterra had set up a charitable project to assist women in China and mothers. This move was a response to cases of poisonous milk that made thousands of infants sick and around four dead. Amongst the companies involved in the poisonous milk scandal was San Lu, 43% owned by Fonterra. This move was made as a gesture to show concern and a way of offering long-term assistance to infant upbringing and maternal healthcare. Immediately responses to the offered revealed appreciation with various leading Medias in china reporting praises to the move. New Zealand’s chairman of Chinese trade associations noted that the donation was substantial and would go a long way in helping. However, some media reported the move as a cynical public relations attempt to hoodwink the vulnerable Chinese families who had fallen victim to the company’s irresponsible act. However, most media outlets reported this as a positive gesture. For instance, New Zealand Herald mentioned that the massive charity donation should stand on its own as rather than being consistently linked to the milk contamination tragedy. In general, while the move to donate to charity has been largely associated with the milk tragedy, this is an act of corporate social responsibility which borders on a corrective action following a market misdoing. In essence, corporate social responsibility is an emotive issue in the modern world and more and more organizations are being encouraged to engage in the same. It is a way through which corporations give to the communities socially and at the same time increase their competitive advantage. This is however just one of the reasons Fonterra has hit the headlines in the recent past.


編輯團隊由海歸留學生,英語專八畢業生及相關專業寫手組成,旨在為您提供高品質的代寫服務。

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Essay_Cheery
微信
北美代写,美国作业代写,网课代修,Assignment代写-100%原创 北美作业代写,【essay代写】,作业【assignment代写】,网课代上代考 英国作业代写,代写英文,英文论文润色代考价格-论文代写高质量平台 essay代写,英文论文代写,网课代修-地表最专业的留学生代写平台 英国作业代写,✔美国代考,【assignment代写】,business代写 北美 论文代写,金融代写,Assignment代写,英文论文润色-100%原创 作业代写,伦敦代写,澳洲代写assignment,,统计代写【包过】 代写被抓,英国代写,,CS作业代写,python代写,美国代写被抓怎么办? Essay代写,澳洲essay代写价格,网课代修,准时✔️高质数学代写 Essay代写,代写作业,网课代修代做-地表最专业的留学生代写机构